Elegant Natasha. Stunning Natasha. Good Natasha. Sharp Natasha. Intelligent Natasha. Natasha the envy of women and men. Natasha of a number of qualities – above all, Natasha the insurgent; Natasha a worthy insurgent. Natasha patriot that could be a worthy patriot. Every part the columnist has simply acknowledged or has simply outlined or has simply highlighted constitutes his interpretation of Senator (Barrister, Mrs.) Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s efficiency when she appeared earlier than Come up Information Good Morning present on Friday, February 28, 2025 to throw gentle on the drama that occurred within the Senate a day or so earlier than.
What was the drama on that day actually about? What occurred within the Senate between her and the Senate President? Was it actually all about her seat re-allocation or re-assignment? Or, was it primarily about one thing else to entrap her – as she was allegedly instructed on the ground of the Senate on the afore-mentioned day of drama?
The columnist noticed the whole lot as proven reside on his tv set that was privately power-generated (on this power-less or electricity-less clime) from the start to the top. The columnist puzzled why, simply why Natasha reacted the way in which she did, and why particularly she dared the Senate President the way in which she did.
What was inevitably amiss? Why was/is Natasha claiming everyone’s consideration the way in which she did (and she or he continues to be doing)? Why have been her fellow senators, greater than a number of of the male senators, I imply, flowing to her in her river of rise up in opposition to the requirements of the Senate that have to be saved up?
Was it as a result of even when she was proper in her classical democratic rise up of a loner, it was vital that the status of the good senators and that of their equally nice however almighty President who shouldn’t be greater than first amongst equals shouldn’t be allowed to dwindle? And why was the Senate President so stupefied when Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan brandished Order 10 a number of occasions as she rebelliously however decorously stood her floor, grounds or no grounds?
Did the Senate President at any time attempt to have a chew or a style of Natasha’s inviting stupefacient, one thing that had brought about him the stupefaction I used to be allowed personally to note by the inside grasp on that day that the rebellious one knocked him to stupor – or to a state of near-stupor earlier than his like-minded senators got here to his rescue?
All these questions are important ones (or have to be important ones) for all those that want to discover a factual and truthful resolution to what’s rising to be a sample of values between the Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator (Mrs.) Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the very spouse of Mr. Godswill Akpabio’s good good friend (or now erstwhile good good friend?).
On Saturday, February 29, 2025, that’s, virtually per week in the past, I learn solely on pages 10-12 of Saturday Vanguard particulars of the Natasha Uduaghan-Godswill Akpabio downside and different proclamations, claims and counter-claims, together with Natasha’s full interview she granted Come up Information Good Morning Present which I had already alluded to.
Natasha answered greater than very satisfactorily all of the questions put to her in regards to the following: “allegations by a northern group”; “harassment of clerk and requests for CVs of employees”; “how the sitting association challenge began”; “denial of rights”; and “the night-club incident.” My assertion(s) to every of her each reply is clearly clear and transparently clear, and brings me to this conclusion: A extremely sensible and sharp feminine senator; a extremely priceless, worthy, no nonsense feminine senator that Senator (Drs. Mrs.) Remi Tinubu, our President’s pricey, pricey spouse, who’s equally shiny and sensible, wants in her core crew of patriots to assist make our nation attain its rightful vacation spot.
However I’ve no persuasive affect no matter upon her to make her see Natasha as I see her – or as I’m seeing her. But I ought to inform her because the inside grasp tells me to say to her what I’m now saying to her. Natasha definitely has her foibles – like all human-beings, together with our one and solely Godswill Akpabio. Her foibles, nonetheless, pale into nothing or insignificance compared together with her positively rebellious bent and method.
Because the matter between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Senator Godswill Akpabio entered our tv screens and newspapers and in every single place outdoors the main-stream media the Senate President has not deemed it proper to assert our consideration with not less than one vital line of defence from his personal persuasive mouth. Why? Others, a few of whom declare to be activists (activists my foot!) have been talking for him.
Why? If he doesn’t need to say something he ought to instruct his hangers-on, together with his lawyer(s), his acolytes and cohorts and sycophants, and Natasha’s back-stabbers within the Senate, to maintain mum till the brouhaha stills itself, evaporates and vanishes. However will it? I don’t suppose so till he transparently opens his line of persuasive rebuttal himself.
By the way in which, why did his spouse, his damsel (who, like Natasha, is an impeccable communicator), come into the fray? What for? I noticed her on tv attempting to influence folks like us in useless. In any case mentioned and accomplished I exclaimed to myself “What for?” within the trope of a query. She mentioned a number of issues which I, as a literary detective and gleaner, punctured. I’ll solely point out one or two right here. (In any case, I’m not Natasha’s lawyer as I’m not Unoma’s lawyer).
She mentioned, amongst different issues, that no girl or ladies ever complained in opposition to her disciplined darling husband as a governor or minister – if I heard her properly. I chuckled. No girl or ladies who succumbed to the sheets-whims-and-caprices of her darling governor- or minister- husband would complain brazenly or in loud silence to Unoma or to anybody for that matter near Unoma. I put this to Unoma as a literary gleaner who’s ever goal come rain or sunshine.
Secondly, her open swipe at Natasha’s husband has drawn the very respectable man who can not harm a fly out of his refined shell. I’m certain that she and her disciplined husband have since seen and skim the mature and refined letter of the extremely cultured Alema of the very superbly nice Kingdom of Warri, the envy of many kingdom-less kingdoms, on what has been that shouldn’t have been.
There are different issues I need to say however which I’m properly holding again as a high Niger Delta personage. What I can do greatest is to immerse myself in my very own quiet method on how one can deliver this matter to and clear finish. The Senate President and the Alema of Warri should meet to resolve the knot within the favour of their friendship and that of the folks of the entire of the Niger Delta and past.
The scenario must be remedied. I understand how, however I received’t open my mouth huge right here. In the meanwhile, nonetheless, Natasha, our worthy insurgent, must be appeased with appeasable appeasement by appeasers agreeable to the events and all of the events in our Niger Delta and the Confluence State and past. I hope I’m not constructing castles in Spain. Phew!
Afejuku may be reached by way of 08055213059.
