186
The Supreme Courtroom has dominated that Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, took deliberate and unconstitutional actions to cripple the Rivers State Home of Meeting in a bid to stop his impeachment.
In a judgment delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim, the apex courtroom discovered that Fubara engaged in a collection of unlawful actions to undermine the legislature lengthy earlier than Speaker Martin Amaewhule and 26 different lawmakers defected from the Peoples Democratic Occasion (PDP).
The courtroom said that the concurrent findings of each the Federal Excessive Courtroom and the Courtroom of Enchantment established that Fubara’s actions have been aimed toward subverting the constitutional features of the Meeting.
Fubara’s Determined Measures
The judgment, a part of Cross-Enchantment No. SC/CV/1175A/2024 filed by Fubara, revealed that the governor’s concern of impeachment prompted him to:
Try to get the Nationwide Meeting to take over the legislative features of Rivers State.
Forestall the Rivers Meeting from convening with a constitutionally required quorum.
Facilitate the relocation of a factional three-member Meeting to an alternate venue.
Withhold Meeting funds and take away the Clerk and Deputy Clerk.
Deploy heavy equipment, together with bulldozers, to demolish the legislative advanced.
Limit lawmakers and Meeting workers from accessing the legislative constructing.
The Supreme Courtroom famous that these actions have been taken in defiance of courtroom orders obtained by the 27 lawmakers to restrain the governor from interfering with their duties.
Fubara Collapsed the Legislature
Justice Agim additional held that Fubara’s strikes rendered the Rivers State Home of Meeting non-functional, making the argument in regards to the lawmakers’ defection irrelevant.
“The eighth respondent [Fubara] collapsed the Rivers State Home of Meeting,” the choose dominated. “Subsequently, no query about any member dropping his seat resulting from defection can validly come up. There should be a Home of Meeting for any constitutional course of, corresponding to declaring a seat vacant, to happen.”
The courtroom additionally dismissed Fubara’s reliance on Sections 102 and 109 of the Structure and the doctrine of necessity, describing it as an excuse to proceed his assault on the legislature.
“No Authorities in Rivers State”
The Supreme Courtroom condemned Fubara’s ways, stating that his concern of impeachment didn’t justify his assaults on the Structure and democratic establishments.
“A authorities can’t be stated to exist with out one of many three arms of presidency,” the ruling learn. “Right here, the Head of the Government has chosen to break down the Legislature so he can rule with out it—as a despot. Because it stands, there isn’t any authorities in Rivers State.”
The judgment stands as a powerful rebuke towards Fubara’s governance strategy, highlighting the hazards of government overreach and unconstitutional ways to keep away from political accountability.
Submit Views: 212
